The Secular Science Industry vs the Abortion Ruling

Addendum added 2 July 2022.

We have seen many times in the past where the secular science industry has supported leftist causes, and now it is increasing. This is indeed unfortunate for the scientist who wants to do science stuff. Many of us can relate, having to earn a living trying to do what is best for the patient or customer. Indeed, if a prospective employer reads this and rejects me, their company is not worth my talent.

Abortion is a sacred sacrament to leftists. Although fake science gave abortion a veneer of deniability with, "The fetus is not human yet, it is just going through past evolutionary stages", people know full well that the fetus is an unborn human baby. Fetus means baby. They want to kill it anyway.

The secular science industry supports leftist causes and suppresses evidence for creation. No surprise that they have increased pro-abortion rhetoric after the overturn of Roe v. Wade.
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the United State Supreme Court overturned the terrible legislation of Roe v. Wade from 1973. Abortion has been an important aspect of the Democrat Party for many years, so they and other leftists are incensed about the ruling. They are also lying about it. After all, it's who they are and what they do. Facts are trampled:
  • Abortion never was a "Constitutional right."
  • It is not outlawed across the nation, the matter is up to each state to decide — the way it should have been according to the Constitution.
  • It is not "healthcare", especially since someone dies.
  • They have no right to protest outside a Supreme Court justice's house, that is a criminal act.
  • Protesting, crying, acts of violence, and other tantrums will not change anything.
  • Most abortion are based on convenience. Special circumstances do not justify them all.
  • There are no known organized efforts to put women who have had abortions into jail. However, they do need Christian counseling, but that is not a legal matter.
The secular science industry got the bit in their teeth and galloped away with all sorts of leftist propaganda that had nothing to do with actual science. Has anyone found anything in secular science journals from a pro-life perspective? For that matter, has anyone seen remarks that those aborted are image bearers of God? That'll be the day!

These are the same sidewinders that control the narrative on origins, disallowing scientific evidence for creation and the Genesis Flood. (They also do the same regarding climate change, favoring the left and suppressing inconvenient data.) After all, creation and Flood evidence would be troubling for these organizations that are populated mostly by atheists, and they won't admit that there is a Creator who makes the rules. It fits that pro-life material is suppressed, since the Bible commands Christians to defend the defenseless and to do good to the downtrodden. Christians need to continue standing up for the unborn, but also presenting the gospel to people.
There is nothing scientific about abortion. If left to nature, the unborn would be born. A few are stillborn through natural occurrences not involving intervention by the mother or doctor, such as by genetic defects, but the system of conception, development and birth is the norm in all sexually-reproducing organisms. Abortion by willful intervention in this natural process is entirely a moral issue grounded in human exceptionalism: the belief that human beings are not merely animals, but free moral agents with minds and souls responsible to God.

Big Science (the leaders of academic science departments, lobbyists and journal editors), should keep out of abortion debates except to offer facts about embryonic development. But consisting primarily of atheists and evolutionists, Big Science and its cohorts in the media have intervened in the abortion issue. The dish out all the Democrat talking points with a false veneer of science, as if to say “all scientists agree” with their position. Bias like this is not new. Historically, Big Science strongly supported eugenics, which had strong ties to Planned Parenthood.

You would do well to read the entire article at "Big Science Tried to Stop Overturning Roe." You may also like "Refuting Arguments Abortionists Use." ADDENDUM 2 July 2022: "Big Science Still Defending Abortion."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bravado Incarnate

Warning: If you click the links, you will be subjected to strong profanity. Buon giorno. Why is it that atheists cry, "Victory is mine!" like Stewie Griffin, even when they humiliate themselves? Some in my acquaintance could slam their hand in a car door and still claim that they won a debate with the car. One of the most obstreperous atheists (who does not believe in free speech link disabled ) that I have ever encountered took a challenge (for some reason, I get all the credit, but others challenged him as well) to call Matt Slick's radio show, Faith and Reason (now renamed to " Matt Slick Live ". He was angry that the "kiddie pool" at the "Please Convince Me" Weblog was not challenging enough. Surprisingly, he did not scream or use profanity, something that I fully expected him to do. The show was entertaining and interesting, to say the least. Unfortunately, he was typical of Internet atheists: Rude Arrogant Prideful
Read more

Where Does It Stop?

Image
I was going to give these topics a rest, but something came up. On a previous post, Zach made a comment, and I am excerpting it here. His first sentence is an answer to a question I had asked him. Hope you're not embarrassed, but I want to give you a more complete response than the comments section would allow: My lack of belief in the supernatural is pretty much complete - I have never seen any reason to attribute a supernatural cause to phenomena. I suppose I rule out supernatural explanations because once you let one in, where do you stop? I look at an event I do not understand and go immediately to natural causes. Even if I can't figure it out, I still would assume it had a natural explanation. I'm worried that if someone started attributing causes to supernatural events, they would skip over the whole 'natural cause' thing and go straight for the supernatural, because technically everything is potentially explainable by an omnipotent being, no?
Read more

The Amazing Super Powers of the Mighty Atheist™

Image
by Cowboy Bob Sorensen Years ago, I wrote "atheist" on Twitter, and one cautioned me about using that word because I risked "calling down the thunder". We know that they can be ornery cusses even on their good days, but I was unaware of the intellectual prowess and wisdom of The Mighty Atheist™, dwarfing that of a mere theist. What I had yet to learn, however, is that they also have super powers that are even magical at times. Now I know better. Christians and creationists, I hope you heed this warning! Graphic modified from  Clker clipart As with other super powers, those of The Mighty Atheist™ are difficult to categorize. Not all atheists and evolutionists have the same powers to the same degree, and there is no special school for gifted atheists under a professor so they can develop their abilities. Like logical fallacies, powers often blend and overlap. Let's saddle up and ride over yonder to Deception Pass where the atheists, atheopaths, anti-crea
Read more