Stormbringer's Thunder

Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory. — Stephen Jay Gould, 1977 Evolution is racist. Why is this concept not being proclaimed more clearly? Evolution, as is popularly defined, is a gradual continuance and weeding out of physical traits. Therefore all the physical traits that we know as defining race……skin color, shape of the eyes, hair, etc., are all supposed to be due to some evolutionary benefit for survival. So we are told, no trait survives the proces of natural selection unless it benefits survival in some way. Therefore all the races of human got that way due to some evolutionary reason. The shape of the eyes, skin and hair color, all presumably got that way for a reason benefitting survival. This, by definition, is racial. Notice what I’m NOT saying. This does not mean that every person who holds to evolution is a biased racist. I’m not saying

Ladies and gentlemen... The creation sensation, Piltdown Superman ! (and the crowd goes wild) Click images for larger views. This bad boy will take over your screen when you click it! Here is the song, lyrics rewritten by the crew at Stormbringer Productions. Click for a much larger image. But if that won't work, the lyrics are typed below: Piltdown Music Part One Pop, pop, pop Piltdown Pop, pop, pop Piltdown Dig it! Your hero's found Southern Ape, Northern Ape Big Bang pick axe Got your wishful thinking Grand foundation full of cracks Fish flops on the sand Wishes he had a hand Fossil, docile, Surrey hostel Dance the PDSM Dance the PDSM (Why'd you write that?) Chain of missing links (How'd you write that?)   Skeptics are having drinks (Why'd you write that?) Proof by hijinks This whole theory stinks New York, London, Paris Munich — Everyone dance the Piltdown Music! Boogie to Nebraska Dig up a pig's tooth Glue down Peppered Moths Fabricate

But the new rebel is a skeptic, and will not entirely trust anything. He has no loyalty; therefore he can never be really a revolutionist. And the fact that he doubts everything really gets in his way when he wants to denounce anything. For all denunciation implies a moral doctrine of some kind; and the modern revolutionist doubts not only the institution he denounces, but the doctrine by which he denounces it. Thus he writes one book complaining that imperial oppression insults the purity of women, and then he writes another book in which he insults it himself. He curses the Sultan because Christian girls lose their virginity, and then curses Mrs. Grundy because they keep it. As a politician, he will cry out that war is a waste of life, and then, as a philosopher, that all life is waste of time. A Russian pessimist will denounce a policeman for killing a peasant, and then prove by the highest philosophical principles that the peasant ought to have killed himself. A man denounces marri

This article will be less cerebral and more "from the heart" as well as the mind.    While writing and researching my "Logic Lessons" series, I have learned quite a few things. Especially when I am on the receiving end of people who claim to be "thinkers", "rational", "logical" and so forth. Very few have given me anything rational. Instead, they hit me with interesting combinations of logical fallacies that are based entirely on emotion. Actually, their reactions are based in hate. They do not even know me, but they hate what I am saying and the Savior that I stand for (John 15.18-21). When I promote an article about creation science, I receive personal attacks from strangers on Twitter. Does that sound like a rational response to you? Me, neither. But so what? It's part of the job for which I enlisted. But I'll never understand what they hope to gain by demonizing the person instead of dealing with the concept ; that is the