Posts

Showing posts with the label William Lane Craig

Video: Atheists with ADD

Image
The old question, "Who made God?" is, I believe, childish and shows lack of thought. Some people disagree with me, and  choose to answer it . It is quite fair to ask a question, and then ask for clarification if you do not understand it. But to ask the same exact question twice in the same conference with the same wording? I believe that many atheopaths (especially the unemployed alcoholics) do not want  answers, they prefer to challenge and look for opportunities to ridicule. And that is what I think is happening with these repeated questions. But then again, I also suspect that they are autistic . And are doing the bidding of one of their hypocritical "leaders", Richard "Daffy" Dawkins. Here is a video highlighting members of the "Repeat Silly Questions Even Thought They've Been Answered" club.

Atheist "Morality" Video - Having it Both Ways

Image

Dawkins: Put Up or Shut Up

Image

Atheist "Philosophers" Are Unsophisticated

Atheism Defined

Atheists and the Burden of Proof

Atheism is a Paper Tiger

Image
You’ll forgive me if I am a bit snarky, but I’m not going to pull any punches. You’ve been warned. (This is also going to be somewhat link-heavy; to really follow along you might have to follow me around the internet. I will also be wordy… pack a lunch.) I have two main points. First, atheism is a paper tiger. Second, the real threat to Christianity is not found outside the church, but from within. I suppose the first bleeds into the latter in a way, but they are somewhat separate points. Now by atheism I am referring, for the sake of this post, to popular atheism such as you’ll hear from the average person, advocated in comments on facebook, the same  kind that’s advocated by the popular atheist evangelists like Hitchens, Harris, Dennett, and Dawkins. These guys are not sophisticated thinkers. They are not philosophers and they frankly, don’t even care enough to do any homework on what they speak on. The whole sorry bunch should have stuck to Dawkins’s wise decision ...