Definitions, Evolution, and the American Police State

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen 

Edited 23 Mat 2922

Free speech is something that is cherished by many people in the Western world, but it is being suppressed drastically. Most of the mainstream media are so left-wing, they fly in circles; news reports infested with opinions. The secular science industry promotes leftist views, and is anti-science in many ways.

Biblical creationists uphold the authority of the Word of God, beginning in Genesis. Biblical truth undermines socialism and many other political evils, so no wonder creation scientists are suppressed when they present evidence against evolution. Something very important that many of us teach is the importance of definitions.

Surveillance, Pixabay / Jürgen Jester (modified with FotoSketcher)

Darwin's acolytes tell us that evolution is a "fact" and that it has been observed. This often comes with conflating variations and speciation (among other things) with evolution, where they are intending to dry gulch people into thinking that Darwin was right. Variations have been observed, but not something changing into something else with added genetic material as vertical evolution requires.

Similarly, an important part of particles-to-paleontologist evolution is mutations. Supposedly, beneficial mutations accumulated over millions of Darwin years and made organisms better than they were. A problem here is that beneficial is a subjective word. Sickle-cell anemia was falsely called a beneficial mutation, therefore, evidence for evolution. Not hardly!

We see that evolution and beneficial mutation can mean different things, so when discussing origins science, definitions need to be nailed down.

In the past few years, the phrases hate speech and hate crime have been used quite a bit. As if assault and battery or vandalism weren't bad enough in the first place, someone decides it had racial or other motivations that are important to those in power. That magically makes those crimes worse. Indeed, sometimes just saying something that is arbitrarily deemed offensive can be a "hate crime!" Hate speech/crimes are not exactly codified, and are ill-defined.

I reported anti-Christian obscenities to Facebook and selected the hate speech option. Every time, the rejected it. But we know what kind of people run Fakebook. No hate speech against Mohammedans is allowed. Two standards, no waiting. Here is one of the milder attacks:

Click for full size. Used under federal Fair Use provisions for educational purposes.

In May 2022, the House of Representatives in the formerly United States is working on an anti-domestic terrorism bill. That should be reason for concern, because leftists are in power. Groups like Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and others that are looting, destroying, and even killing people are seldom prosecuted. The actions of these groups clearly fit what one would expect to fit a term like domestic terrorists. They are favored by the left, you savvy that?

As Tucker Carlson points out, terrorism is not really defined. When words are flexible (as we saw above), they can mean what those in power want them to mean. Conservatives, Christians, and others can be simply labeled as terrorists and have their basic freedoms infringed. This child suspects that it helps pave the way for the Antichrist, but even if I'm wrong, there are serious reasons for concern.

Definitions matter, old son. There's a video below I'd like you to see, and I also suggest reading "Logic and Definitions", both my part and the article linked within.