Miracles and the Evolution of Jesus

For many professing Christians in several denominations, Palm Sunday is the beginning of Holy Week. As a child in the United Methodist Church, we were given palm tree fronds to place at the front of the church. There are variations where Holy Week ends on Saturday, others count Easter Sunday.

Secularists try to dismiss the Resurrection and miracles through naturalistic means. Some claim religion evolved. That is the opposite of the truth.
Credit: Pixabay / Gerd Altmann
Some sects continue liturgical celebrations after Easter. Bible-believing Christians know the truths from Scripture that Jesus rose from the dead and is at the right hand of God the Father (Rom. 8:34), so our observance is continual.

Naturalists deny miracles, including the recent creation in six days, the Resurrection, Jesus and Peter walking on water, and other things, so they attempt to evosplain them away according to their fundamentally flawed presuppositions. (Liberal theologians and secularists can be seen at this time of year on secular documentaries denying the truth.) Some say that religion evolved (see "The Non-Evolution of Religion"), but that is the opposite of the truth and is based on speculations.

These owlhoots need to cowboy up and be honest: Jesus is God the Son, and he did what the Gospels have recorded to us. This is an excellent time to examine the evidence without evolutionary preconceptions, humble ourselves, repent, and believe in Christ for our salvation. What follows is an article from 2014 that illustrates how fake science and bad logic are used by materialists to suppress the truth. 
It’s Easter time.  That means the secularists are hatching and buzzing like cicadas with their latest attempts to debunk the Bible’s account of Christ and his miracles.

With atheist billboards proclaiming “Jesus did not die for your sins,” what position should scientists and science reporters take on documents pertaining to a historical figure written by contemporary eyewitnesses?  Perhaps neutrality would be preferable to what often appears in the media in Easter season.

How does one put “Jesus” and “evolution” adjacent in the same sentence?  Steven Prothero (religion department, Boston University) on National Geographic found a way; “On Easter, Jesus’ Evolution Tells of Changing America.”  He doesn’t assert that Jesus himself evolved, therefore, but that American attitudes about him have.  True as that may be, it gives the impression that anyone can think whatever they want about Jesus.  A scientist or historian should pursue the facts, not the swirling opinions of diverse interest groups who try to appropriate Jesus to their biases.

To read the rest, head on over to "Did Jesus Evolve? Secularists Make Hay at Easter".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Religion of Atheism

Where Does It Stop?

The Amazing Super Powers of the Mighty Atheist™