Taqiyya, Mohammedans, and Facebook "Standards"

Taqiyya gives Muslims license to deceive unbelievers.

 Not everyone knows this, but Mohammedans are permitted to lie to unbelievers to gain our trust and then defeat us. It's called "Taqiyya". I reckon that this falls under the heading of "the end justifies the means". One instance of this on Facebook was done by a Page called "Western Terrorism Watch". The name implies that they are one of several Pages that report Islamic terrorism. Instead, they are loaded with hatred for the Israel, the United States, Canada and the Western world in general.

 They came to my attention when they reacted to the article, "Evolutionary Thinking and ISIS Atrocities" when it was posted on The Question Evolution Project:
A pro-terrorist Page on Facebook complained when an article against terrorism was posted.
Posted under "Fair Use" terms for educational purposes. Besides, it was in my e-mail.

 Ironic to be called hypocritical by hypocrites. Their Page has only nine "Likes" at this writing, but their hate-speech posts and remarks are deplorable, and loaded with straw man arguments, false generalizations, and more. More of "the end justifies the means", ISIS is a murderous terrorist group that is capable of burning people alive, such as this Jordanian pilot. This bunch of pit vipers are not content to kill infidels, but will also kill other Mohammedans, such as these in a Yemen mosque.

 If post something that is offensive to the Gaystapo, militant atheists, leftists, other groups, your post will get pulled down and you'll get slapped around by Fazebook. But if you report hate speech against Christians, Conservatives, traditional family advocates, creationists, and so forth, you're shooting craps and the dice are loaded against you:
Atheist Zuckerberg and his leftist crew do nothing against many forms of hate speech, but approve of anti-Christian, anti-Conservative, anti-creationist, anti-Semitic hate speech.
Image courtesy of Why?Outreach

 I tried to report the terrorism lovers to Facebook. You can guess what happened:
Facebook "standards" in action. That is, hate speech against Christians, Americans, Canadians, the Western world, Israel and others is acceptable.

 When you have a social media site that is run by leftists and atheist Zuckerberg, don't be surprised when you get waved aside. And Fazebook shouldn't be surprised when something else comes along that has consistent standards and FB becomes as relevant tomorrow as MySpace is today. If I didn't have to be on there to reach people, I wouldn't be there at all.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bravado Incarnate

Warning: If you click the links, you will be subjected to strong profanity. Buon giorno. Why is it that atheists cry, "Victory is mine!" like Stewie Griffin, even when they humiliate themselves? Some in my acquaintance could slam their hand in a car door and still claim that they won a debate with the car. One of the most obstreperous atheists (who does not believe in free speech link disabled ) that I have ever encountered took a challenge (for some reason, I get all the credit, but others challenged him as well) to call Matt Slick's radio show, Faith and Reason (now renamed to " Matt Slick Live ". He was angry that the "kiddie pool" at the "Please Convince Me" Weblog was not challenging enough. Surprisingly, he did not scream or use profanity, something that I fully expected him to do. The show was entertaining and interesting, to say the least. Unfortunately, he was typical of Internet atheists: Rude Arrogant Prideful
Read more

Where Does It Stop?

Image
I was going to give these topics a rest, but something came up. On a previous post, Zach made a comment, and I am excerpting it here. His first sentence is an answer to a question I had asked him. Hope you're not embarrassed, but I want to give you a more complete response than the comments section would allow: My lack of belief in the supernatural is pretty much complete - I have never seen any reason to attribute a supernatural cause to phenomena. I suppose I rule out supernatural explanations because once you let one in, where do you stop? I look at an event I do not understand and go immediately to natural causes. Even if I can't figure it out, I still would assume it had a natural explanation. I'm worried that if someone started attributing causes to supernatural events, they would skip over the whole 'natural cause' thing and go straight for the supernatural, because technically everything is potentially explainable by an omnipotent being, no?
Read more

The Amazing Super Powers of the Mighty Atheist™

Image
by Cowboy Bob Sorensen Years ago, I wrote "atheist" on Twitter, and one cautioned me about using that word because I risked "calling down the thunder". We know that they can be ornery cusses even on their good days, but I was unaware of the intellectual prowess and wisdom of The Mighty Atheist™, dwarfing that of a mere theist. What I had yet to learn, however, is that they also have super powers that are even magical at times. Now I know better. Christians and creationists, I hope you heed this warning! Graphic modified from  Clker clipart As with other super powers, those of The Mighty Atheist™ are difficult to categorize. Not all atheists and evolutionists have the same powers to the same degree, and there is no special school for gifted atheists under a professor so they can develop their abilities. Like logical fallacies, powers often blend and overlap. Let's saddle up and ride over yonder to Deception Pass where the atheists, atheopaths, anti-crea
Read more