May 6, 2011

Bravado Incarnate

Warning: If you click the links, you will be subjected to strong profanity.

Buon giorno. Why is it that atheists cry, "Victory is mine!" like Stewie Griffin, even when they humiliate themselves? Some in my acquaintance could slam their hand in a car door and still claim that they won a debate with the car.


One of the most obstreperous atheists (who does not believe in free speech link disabled) that I have ever encountered took a challenge (for some reason, I get all the credit, but others challenged him as well) to call Matt Slick's radio show, Faith and Reason (now renamed to "Matt Slick Live". He was angry that the "kiddie pool" at the "Please Convince Me" Weblog was not challenging enough. Surprisingly, he did not scream or use profanity, something that I fully expected him to do. The show was entertaining and interesting, to say the least. Unfortunately, he was typical of Internet atheists:
  • Rude
  • Arrogant
  • Prideful
  • Self contradicting
  • Broke basic rules of logic
  • Interrupting and talking over the show's host right after bragging, "We don't do that in the UK"
  • Creating new definitions of terms that only exist in his mind
  • Bouncing around topics like a table tennis ball in a clothes dryer
  • And, the most typical is the refusal to even consider the possibility that a Christian can be right about anything
If you want to see his profane bravado, you can go herehere, here and here the targets of the links proving my points have been disabled. I can guess why... What an astonishingly huge ego! If you see the stunningly vapid comments (including "Matt Slick was pathetic"), there is an accusation in the newest one by one of Norman's sock puppets that a commenter is Matt himself. Now, why is it inconceivable (yes, that word does mean what I think it does) that more than one or two people can disagree with an atheist? 

There is an amazing accusation that the Weblog owner made against another atheist that it was me in disguise (I get accused of using multiple fake names all the time by people who use multiple fake names. However, most of mine are clearly marked so they can be traced back to me.)  Here, they are accusing someone else of being Matt Slick. Guess what, Poindexter? Matt told me personally that he does not post comments because there are impostors.

Also, the comments are full of braggadocio and of vacuous atheists uniting in hate. My feeling is that people who would not be able to tolerate each other in other things are self-congratulating, "Good job! You really told him!", for the sake of hating God. What is it with pride and egos with these atheists? The ones who want real discussions should stay far away from this type!

By the way, Slick said to him, "You hate God". He denied it. Liar (link disabled).

Now, I hate to tell Matt this, but I felt that he dropped the ball on a couple of points. But he's the one that has done real debates, not me. And this was a "cold call" from a revved up, angry hatebag who had prepped himself for the call.

So, if he thinks Matt was not a challenge, he should move up the ladder. I would like to see this deluded egomaniac humiliate himself further (even though I spanked him several times in public myself, but he still could not learn basic logic). How about calling Greg Koukl at Stand to Reason? Or better yet, call another outspoken Calvinist and apologist, James White? They would send you crying and hiding in Norman the Paranoid Troll's basement with the poisonous talking wall fungus, and you would still scream, "Victory is mine!" Or even go on "Unbelievable" with Justin Brierley and show the world what an intellectual giant you really are.

By the way, Matt told me to tell you (remember, he does not post himself) that he wants you to call back and show people again what atheism does to the mind.

Anyway, I am done with this brain damaged maniac and liar. I have better things to do; harvesting my crops on Farmville is more intellectually stimulating that dealing with this clown, capice?

Safe linkIf you want to listen to the "discussion", click here, it starts about 17 minutes 55 seconds in.

Addendum: He's laughing at me laughing at him (also disabled). For students of logic, take a look. Count the ad hominem attacks (from the beginning), look for straw man arguments, misrepresentation and just downright bad writing. Reinhold Niebuhr said, "No amount of contrary evidence seems to disturb humanity's good opinion of itself." That is definitely true of this blighter.

16 comments:

Rhomphaia (Sword) said...

Amazing.

He KNOWS there is no god.

Stormbringer said...

And "knowing" that there is no God is a violation of logic in and of itself. Prideful arrogance, I tell ya!

Rhomphaia (Sword) said...

Funny, I just typed up something almost word for word of your comment last night.

I now wish I'd finished it last night but my eyelids got too heavy!

Its hard to type on the nods!

nickyandolini said...

You should get all of the ones Pubes thinks is your sock puppets together at one time. Whats funny is that he blamed me for being Matt. Almost time for another award and I don't know if it should be Pubes again or this tardboy that you're talking about.

Stormbringer said...

One problem with getting the people together that Norman ("Pubes") thinks are me in disguise is that several of them hate me, so they would not co-operate.

Besides, it would prove nothing to his microcephalic mind.

Rhomphaia (Sword) said...

Nicky and SB,

You provoke them so!

But if you ever throw a "sockpuppet" party- I better get an invite so I can see if I can figure out who is really who!

Stormbringer said...

Nicky's admitting to using a sock puppet at whatzisname's site, but what's funny is when they accuse real people of being sock puppets. Worse, they are calling people liars from sock puppets!

Rhomphaia (Sword) said...

Ah yes. Too funny!

ayn rand so far away said...

Matt told me personally that he does not post comments because there are impostors.

Maybe Matt should update his website that says:
"Matt also uses pseudonyms when exploring, gathering information, testing ideas, and generally does not affirm or deny who he is or isn't regarding pseudonyms on the internet."

Stormbringer said...

Matt was discussing this kind of format. If you listened to his radio show, you would hear him say how he goes into chat rooms on occasions ("They know who I am").

A more accurate update of his statement would be helpful, however, I agree to that extent.

Alex B said...

Hey, Jesus Johnny, when are you going to grow a pair and call the Atheist Experience? Oh, that's right, you aren't, because you're a coward and a bullshitting blowhard.

Twat.

Stormbringer said...

I prefer the name "Gospel Bob".

Now I can further humiliate you by showing your lack of logic and put something on record:

* YOU are the clown that was whining that the Please Convince Me Weblog was not satisfying to you.

* I was not the only one to urge you to call Matt Slick.

* I am not the one with the massive ego, trying to be the smartest blighter on the 'Net.

* Elsewhere I stated that I have doubts about the usefulness of debates.

* If they are as arrogant and illogical as you, I could trounce them as well, but they would not even understand it. At any rate, I have heard "debates" with AE. Nicky and I have been involved with knife fights in the schoolyard that have more dignity.

Your latest go at Matt was better than the first one, and very entertaining. It further illustrates how atheism causes brain damage. Did you look up lamarckianism yet? You were preaching it, Matt was describing it, you were disagreeing and putting words in his mouth. Again. Dolt.

Now go away, or I shall taunt you again.

Stormbringer said...

Here's the logic: Since he called Matt and "debated" him (making a horse's rear out of himself), that act somehow obligates me to debate the Atheist Experience.

List the logic fallacies, gang. I'll start: False dilemma. Who's next?

Stormbringer said...

By the way, Cupcake. I've given you the links where I spanked you seven ways 'till sundown several times over. YOU can look for them, you're stupid but not that stupid. Lazy, well, probably.

Alex B said...

So you're a coward then.

Stormbringer said...

So you have the mental capacity and grasp of logic equal to that of a rotting cabbage. What proofs about you that may have been lacking in my explanations, you managed to save the day by coming along and proving me right.

I hope the Atheist Experience people have a better grasp of reality and logic than you, for their sakes. But from what I've heard from them in debates, I strongly suspect that they are only slightly better than you.

Why do people insist on reading bad philosophy by Daffy Dawkins and substituting that for their own thought processes?

OK, door's closed. No more comments from you allowed.

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated and become my property. Remember, you can have your own discussions on the topics at hand by using the social media sharing buttons beneath each post.

Subscribe in a reader