I was pondering some of the stories that Neil told me about his cheapskate but very large Fortune 100 company. First, they claim to be interested in "diversity". Their propaganda has phrases like this:
- Diversity is about having a broad mix of talent in our operations
- A diverse workforce offers unique perspectives, ideas and solutions
- [With] diverse workforce, we can better meet the needs of the increasing multicultural clients, communities and individuals
- Build teams that bring together varied points of view to generate unique ideas and business solutions
- Age, experience, gender, ethnic backgrounds all contribute to a grand and glorious whole (my summary of some of their other propaganda)
If you, Mr. Employer, claim to value people, you had better be prepared to accept the whole package.
Neil raises a very good question, and I agree: If The Company values the diversity of employees, and expect this diversity, then why on earth do they demand a uniformity of production? Yes, that's a very good question.
Here's something else that came up about their cheapness: Raises. I believe in a two-tier approach to a pay rise. First, a "thanks for coming in and being a good worker" kind of thing. Then, an increase based on merit. If it's all based on merit, and the standards are too high to obtain the pay rise, The Company should not be surprised when productivity drops off and good employees become less good, even finding other jobs. If you want good work, you pay for it, capice?