Guten tag. I've just gone through Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed for the second time, and I'm glad I bought the DVD. The first time through, I had to walk away because the logical conclusion of what the movie presented is very upsetting. Not much of a fan of documentaries, but this one sings a song that I've been doing for many years. It shows the flaws of the philosophies of Darwinism, and the discrimination of the scientific establishment against anyone that dares run against their orthodoxy and say that maybe, just perhaps, Intelligent Design (I.D.) should be considered an alternative explanation of the facts.
Some of what I'm writing now is a repeat of previous postings. Get over it, because it's important, capice?
Important point: Defining the term “evolution” is the gradual development of life over vast periods of time, with transitional forms leading to completely new species of life. I am not talking about microevolution, which leads to small changes and adaptations. Also, there is some disagreement about Creation Science. Many Creationists will use science to explain things in the Bible, but are fully able to present a strictly scientific framework for their views without invoking anything religious. In this way, there is not much difference between a Creationist and a proponent of Intelligent Design.
Nobody is quibbling about facts. A fact is a fact. It's the interpretations of facts that have the problems. You show me a fossil. Great. It's a fossil. You tell me that it was formed over millions of years and is evidence for evolution, and I'll laugh in your face and say that there are other possible explanations. You show me a drawing of archeopteryx. Then you say that archeopteryx is a transitional form, and I'll give you a scientific slapdown because you're being ideological and out of touch, because "Archie" has been reclassified as a true bird. Your starting point, your world view, influences your interpretations of evidence. It should be the other way around, but let’s be honest here. Scientists are human, even though many want you to believe that they’re somehow superior to us mere mortals.
Evolution is not science. It is a philosophy of the interpretation of facts. In the same way, Intelligent Design is not science, either. Now, hear me out! Both approaches have to take existing facts and interpret them. It annoys the hell out of me when evolutionists get all uppity and say that “Creationists are not scientists” or “Proponents of Intelligent Design are not scientists”, because that’s where philosophy comes in for either system of interpretation. Scientists that disagree with evolutionism are not automatically disqualified from being scientists. They have their credentials from accredited schools, just like their Darwin-loving counterparts. F’rinstance, Creationist astronomer Don DeYoung did not get his Ph.D. from “Billy Bob’s Backwater Bible Barn”, he went to “real” schools. Hey, Don, I still have the autographed book!
Intelligent Design and Creationism are ridiculed, misunderstood and flat-out maligned. I do not come across many believers in evolutionism that have examined the evidence for I.D. and the abundant evidence against evolution. Evolutionists are arrogantly biased in their assertions that they are right, and anybody has a grain of sense cannot argue with them. But true science will pursue any line of questioning and follow the evidence to wherever it leads.
Evolutionists jealously guard their philosophies and make excuses. They do not examine the flaws in their own theories except to make excuses. Listen to some of their nonsense, and you’ll hear a great deal of “maybe”, “could have”, “perhaps”, “nobody really knows”, and yet they insist that evolution is true and is to believed without question. Guesswork, speculation — but Intelligent Design is still wrong in their minds. (Addendum: This was given to me on March 3, 2009. Look at the guesswork and speculation in this article.) Daring to suggest that evolution has flaws is strictly forbidden. If any scientists dare to question the religious orthodoxy of Darwinism, they risk losing their jobs and are blacklisted.
Ironically, many of the greatest scientists were believers, and many were Creationists.
Tune in again for the exciting conclusion of this fascinating missive! Or, click here.
